In this example, the horizontal axis represents the different transactions in the schedule D. The vertical axis represents time order of operations. Schedule D consists of three transactions T1, T2, T3. The schedule describes the actions of the transactions as seen by the DBMS. First T1 Reads and Writes to object X, and then Commits. Then T2 Reads and Writes to object Y and Commits, and finally T3 Reads and Writes to object Z and Commits. This is an example of a serial schedule, ie, sequential with no overlap in time, because the actions of in all three transactions are sequential, and the transactions are not interleaved in time.
Representing the schedule D above by a table (rather than a list) is just for the convenience of identifying each transaction's operations in a glance. This notation is used throughout the article below. A more common way in the technical literature for representing such schedule is by a list:
Usually, for the purpose of reasoning about concurrency control in databases, an operation is modeled as atomic, occurring at a point in time, without duration. When this is not satisfactory start and end time-points and possibly other point events are specified (rarely). Real executed operations always have some duration and specified respective times of occurrence of events within them (eg, "exact" times of beginning and completion), but for concurrency control reasoning usually only the precedence in time of the whole operations (without looking into the quite complex details of each operation) matters, ie, which operation is before, or after another operation. Furthermore, in many cases the before / after relationships between two specific operations do not matter and should not be specified, while being specified for other pairs of operations.
In general operations of transactions in a schedule can interleave (ie, transactions can be executed concurrently), while time orders between operations in each transaction remain unchanged as implied by the transaction's program. Since not always time orders between all operations of all transactions matter and need to be specified, a schedule is, in general, a partial order between operations rather than a total order (where order for each pair is determined, as in a list of operations .) Also in the general case each transaction may consist of several processes, and itself be properly represented by a partial order of operations, rather than a total order. Thus in general a schedule is a partial order of operations, containing (embedding) the partial orders of all its transactions.
Carousel Checks | Online jackpot | dashboard reporting excel | How to become an actor | Auditions for Disney channel | How to become famous | Modeling Career | Explore Talent Compaints | I want to be a model | Americas next top model auditions | Cake Rakeback | camping checklist |
Carousel Checks | Online jackpot | dashboard reporting excel | How to become an actor | Auditions for Disney channel | How to become famous | Modeling Career | Explore Talent Compaints | I want to be a model | Americas next top model auditions | Cake Rakeback | camping checklist |
